In Search of P. D. Ouspensky has 49 ratings and 5 reviews. Cynde said: I’d long been curious about what the deal was between those two, Gurdjieff and Ous. In Search of P.D. Ouspensky: Peter Demian Ouspensky (—) and George Ivanovich Gurdjieff (ca. —), esoteric teachers of. = sr_1_16?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=&sr=&keywords=gary+.

Author: JoJogrel Gasida
Country: Malaysia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 4 September 2006
Pages: 150
PDF File Size: 13.45 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.78 Mb
ISBN: 606-1-85957-728-9
Downloads: 21205
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kigaran

W ould Ouspensky have been better off never meeting Mr. At the end of his life, if not before, Ouspensky certainly felt this way and Gary Lachman agrees. And he was wrong For me, it’s not an exaggeration to suggest it was a mistake for Ouspensky to abandon his own creativity and ideas to become an exponent of Gurdjieff’s teaching. Shadows of Heaven p.d.ouspsnsky Gurdjieff and Orage: Brothers in Elysium see TGJ 4, 17 and 25, respectively. Ouspensky Left the Teaching Lachman, a former rock and roll musician, was involved with the Work in England for several years.

He counts that “time well spent; yet, eventually I found myself moving away from the work to explore other ideas. But as the years went by I returned And as Gurdjieff said, “There is p.f.ouspensky that shows up a man better than his attitude towards the work and the teacher after he has left it.

That at the end of his life, melancholic and drinking too much, he finally confessed, “I taught too early,” isn’t the point. Ouspensky was never commissioned to teach. The truth behind his announcement upon his return to England in that he had “abandoned the system” is that he had abandoned it 25 years earlier. Ironically, and sadly, in doing so, Ouspensky unintentionally paralleled the fictional character Ivan Osokin in his novel Strange Life of Ivan Osokin: It is hard to believe that I can actually do nothing at all.

But, at the same time, what have I done so far? I have only spoiled everything. Searfh give myself up to the magician? That again seems strange, even cowardly. Probably this is where the greatest illusion p.d.ouspenzky, because to become convinced and to admit to oneself that one can actually do nothing is not cowardly at all.

Was he a genius? Lachman’s assessment seems a bit too high, but the point won’t be argued, for if he was, then according to Gurdjieff, geniuses, like angels, have no possibility of developing.

In Search of P. D. Ouspensky: The Genius in the Shadow of Gurdjieff – Gary Lachman – Google Books

So even in his choice of p.d.ouspenxky the author gets it wrong. Coetzee, “What Is a Classic? So we arrive at a certain paradox. The classic defines itself by surviving. Therefore the interrogation of the classic, no matter how hostile, is part of the history of the classic, inevitable and even to be welcomed. For as long as the classic needs to be protected from attack, it can never prove p.d.oupensky classic. One might even venture further along this road to say that the function of criticism is defined by the classic: Thus p.r.ouspensky fear that the classic will not survive the decentering acts of criticism may be turned on its head: Criticism may in that sense be one of the instruments of the cunning of history.


So our author is to be thanked and commended for playing his role in bringing up once again the question of the Gurdjieff-Ouspensky relationship and so, in effect, bringing to mind the unrivaled esoteric classic of the last century and this, George Ivanovitch Gurdjieff’s All and Everything.

Lachman says what led him to write his book was William Patrick Patterson’s Struggle of the Magicians. While he found the book “fascinating,” he says, “I found myself questioning its premises that Ouspensky failed to grasp the import of Gurdjieff’s mission, and, when it came to it, couldn’t abandon his own independence, self-will, and egoism in order to devote himself entirely to Gurdjieff’s work.

But in doing so one needs to not overlook or eliminate important and telling facts that weigh against one’s interpretation. Why Did Ouspensky Leave? What was the chief impetus behind these three breaks? The early history of the relationship we know from Ouspensky’s Search. Having been involved with Theosophy a pseudoteaching Gurdjieff clearly disdainedOuspensky said he wanted a teaching “of a more rational kind.

While interested in the teaching intellectually, Ouspensky refused to join a Work group. It was only when Gurdjieff began to no more than half answer his questions that he reluctantly agreed to join. As Gurdjieff was living in Moscow and Ouspensky in St.

Petersburg, he had Ouspensky gather people there for a group which Gurdjieff would visit every two weeks. Ouspensky speaks of this as “The St. Petersburg Conditions,” an odd bit of legalese, as teachers do not make contracts with their students.

In Search of P. D. Ouspensky: The Genius in the Shadow of Gurdjieff by Gary Lachman

Interestingly, this and later Essentuki material appears in Ouspensky’s first draft of Searchbut was cut from the p.d.ouspemsky version. The First Break Ouspensky’s first break with Gurdjieff occurred inonly three years and p.d.kuspensky months after they first met.

The break was presaged as early as August in Finland. Ouspensky had been wanting what he called “the miracle. Though it brought a wealth of deep insights, Ouspensky refused to be completely sincere with his teacher breaking the first demand of the Work. He held something back. In other words, he still believes he can see the teacher and so judge him, whereas he will later write that a student cannot see the teacher.

So, apparently even this early, Ouspensky was only “auditing” the teaching, not taking himself as a student. Lachman gives only a literal mention of the Finland experience. Seeing how Ouspensky p.d.kuspensky his emotional center with an over-inflated intellectual center Ouspensky’s chief feature was “extreme individualism,” and “Wraps Up All Thought”Gurdjieff ingeniously used Ouspensky’s “St. Petersburg Conditions” against him in the hopes of breaking through his student’s emotional defenses.


Because of the civil war raging p.x.ouspensky Russia, Gurdjieff called his Moscow and St.

Petersburg students to him in Essentuki, in the Caucasus. After they arrived, he told Ouspensky the Moscow students were acting up and that he was responsible. Bewildered, Ouspensky said he was only responsible for the St. Not only unfair, his teacher’s insistence was irrational, something that all intellectuals, and Ouspensky especially, would despise.

This was a defining moment: He identified and so left Gurdjieff, trumping up the excuse that Gurdjieff was leading them on the religious path, requiring blind obedience and faith. This identification was the real reason behind Ouspensky’s break.

Follow me on Twitter

ot It, too, was cut from the published version of Search but is reported in Struggle of the Magicians and again in the video Gurdjieff’s Mission. The following August he again broke with Gurdjieff and left for London. Again, Gurdjieff had worked on Ouspensky’s emotional center, acting strangely and telling him dirty jokes and creating black and white dramas which always evoked Ouspensky’s sensitivity to good and evil. Though Ouspensky had only fragments of the fuller teaching that Gurdjieff was to later give, his efforts were serious enough for him to have come to a new feeling of “I.

This confidence is the result of that work on myself which I began four years ago. According to Lord Pentland, people leave because of “their grandmother, indigestion, money or sex.

In Search of P.D. Ouspensky

And few leave rightly. They sneak out the back door. Coetzee, Stranger Shores New York: Rudra Press,p. Arete Communications,pp. Oddly, John Shirley’s Gurdjieff: Tarcher, also does not mention this or a number of other salient ideas in Struggle of the Magicians. Chess LifeOctoberp. For the remainder of this article, please order The Gurdjieff Journal Issue 37 If the ideas and perspectives you’ve found in this article are of interest, please subscribe to The Gurdjieff Journal.

We promise you four lively, provocative issues of the only international journal devoted to exploring self-transformation in the contemporary world and the teaching of G. The Gurdjieff Journal publishes interviewsbook excerpts, essays and book reviews. It does not, and will not, carry advertising.

For its publication, it relies solely on the support of its readership.